A T O home
Legal Database
Search   
for 
 
Access the database 
Browse database
Searches  
View last document
Quick access 
View legislation
View a document
Email Cross Reference Material Previous/Next Section Contents Previous/Next Result
Printable version
Printable
version

ATO Interpretative Decision

ATO ID 2010/162

Superannuation
Self managed Superannuation Fund: limited recourse borrowing arrangement - borrowing from a related party on terms favourable to the self managed superannuation fund

Attention This ATO ID was amended to clarify that paragraph 109(1)(b) of the SISA requires the dealing, rather than the relationship between the parties, to be at arm's length.
Attention This document has changed over time. View its history.
FOI status: may be released

CautionCAUTION: This is an edited and summarised record of a Tax Office decision. This record is not published as a form of advice. It is being made available for your inspection to meet FOI requirements, because it may be used by an officer in making another decision.

This ATOID provides you with the following level of protection:

If you reasonably apply this decision in good faith to your own circumstances (which are not materially different from those described in the decision), and the decision is later found to be incorrect you will not be liable to pay any penalty or interest. However, you will be required to pay any underpaid tax (or repay any over-claimed credit, grant or benefit), provided the time limits under the law allow it. If you do intend to apply this decision to your own circumstances, you will need to ensure that the relevant provisions referred to in the decision have not been amended or repealed. You may wish to obtain further advice from the Tax Office or from a professional adviser.


Issue

Does a self-managed superannuation fund (SMSF) trustee contravene section 109 of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) if it borrows money from a related party of the SMSF under a limited recourse borrowing arrangement on terms favourable to the SMSF?

Decision

No. The terms cannot be more favourable to the related party than would have been the case had the parties been dealing at arm's length, but there is no contravention of section 109 of the SISA if the terms are more favourable to the SMSF.

Facts

An SMSF trustee has entered into a limited recourse borrowing arrangement on 1 June 2009. The arrangement meets the requirements of former subsection 67(4A) of the SISA.

The arrangement is to acquire an income producing asset for the SMSF.

The lender under the borrowing arrangement is a related party of the SMSF.

The interest rate imposed under the borrowing arrangement is lower than the rate that would be available to the SMSF from an arm's length lender for an otherwise similar loan.

Apart from the interest rate charged, the borrowing is on arm's length terms and conditions and is supported by appropriate documentation and record keeping.

Reasons for Decision

'Invest' is defined in subsection 10(1) of the SISA to mean applying assets in any way, or making a contract, for the purpose of gaining interest, income, profit or gain.

When entering into the limited recourse borrowing arrangement the SMSF trustee is investing for the purposes of section 109 of the SISA.

Subsection 109(1) of the SISA imposes requirements with respect to relevant transactions for investments made by SMSFs.

In particular paragraph 109(1)(b) of the SISA applies where the parties to the transaction are not dealing with each other at arm's length. The provision requires that the terms and conditions of the transaction must not be more favourable to the other party than would be reasonably expected if the parties were dealing with each other at arm's length.

Borrowing money under the limited recourse borrowing arrangement is a transaction entered into in the course of making an investment by the SMSF. It is therefore a transaction to which paragraph 109(1)(b) of the SISA applies where the parties are not dealing with each other at arm's length.

It is expected that establishing the arrangement, including establishing the borrowing, would be documented and conducted in a business-like manner in the same way as an arrangement when dealing with an arm's length lender.

In this case, the interest rate imposed under the borrowing arrangement is lower than the rate that would be available to the SMSF trustee from an arm's length lender for an otherwise similar loan. This indicates that the parties are not dealing at arm's length in respect of the borrowing arrangement. However, given that the terms of the borrowing arrangement are more favourable to the SMSF trustee than the other party there is no contravention of paragraph 109(1)(b) by entering into this arrangement.

Subsection 109(1A) of the SISA applies to dealings with parties that are not at arm's length, during the term of the investment to ensure that the investments are maintained on an arm's length basis. Subsection 109(1A) of the SISA applies after an investment to which paragraph 109(1)(b) applies has commenced and is interpreted in that context. As a result provided the dealing is not more favourable to the other party than would be expected had the parties been at arm's length then the provision will not be contravened.

Amendment History

Date of Amendment Part Comment
27 May 2016 Reasons for decision Amended to clarify that paragraph 109(1)(b) of the SISA requires the dealing, rather than the relationship between the parties, to be at arm's length.

Date of decision: 9 September 2010

Year of income:Year ended 30 June 2009

Legislative References:
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
   subsection 10(1)
   former subsection 67(4A)
   subsection 109(1)
   subsection 109(1A)

Related Public Rulings (including Determinations)
Self-Managed Superannuation Funds Ruling SMSFR 2009/2

Keywords
Self-managed superannuation funds
SMSF borrowings

Siebel/TDMS Reference Number: 1-1WILGD9; 1-7HJYKKU

Business Line: Superannuation Centre of Expertise

Date of publication: 17 September 2010

ISSN: 1445-2782

ATO ID 2010/162 history   Top  
   Date   Version 
    9 September 2010   Original statement   
 You are here ®  27 May 2016   Updated statement   


 


Top of page
More information on page