ATO Interpretative Decision
ATO ID 2003/905 (Withdrawn)
Deductions: expenses in updating and revising a book
FOI status: may be released
||The ATO view expressed in this ATO ID current and expresses a straight application of the law. General guidance on the view contained in this ATO ID can be found in web content Other deductions (QC 31921).
||This document has changed over time. View its history.
Status of this decision: Decision withdrawn 29 September 2017.
|CAUTION: This is an edited and summarised record of a Tax Office decision. This record is not published as a form of advice. It is being made available for your inspection to meet FOI requirements, because it may be used by an officer in making another decision.|
This ATOID provides you with the following level of protection:
If you reasonably apply this decision in good faith to your own circumstances (which are not materially different from those described in the decision), and the decision is later found to be incorrect you will not be liable to pay any penalty or interest. However, you will be required to pay any underpaid tax (or repay any over-claimed credit, grant or benefit), provided the time limits under the law allow it. If you do intend to apply this decision to your own circumstances, you will need to ensure that the relevant provisions referred to in the decision have not been amended or repealed. You may wish to obtain further advice from the Tax Office or from a professional adviser.
Is the taxpayer, an author of a published book, entitled to a deduction under section 8-1 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) for expenses incurred in updating and revising the book?
Yes. The taxpayer, an author of a published book, is entitled to a deduction under section 8-1 of the ITAA 1997 for expenses incurred in updating and revising the book, as the expenses were incurred in gaining or producing the taxpayer's assessable income from royalties.
The taxpayer is the author of a book that has been published.
The taxpayer receives royalties from sales of the book.
The taxpayer is required by their publisher to keep the book up to date.
In completing the required revisions, the taxpayer has incurred stationery and postage expenses, travel expenses and library expenses.
The taxpayer does not carry on a business of writing books.
The taxpayer's assessable income includes the royalties they receive, pursuant to section 15-20 of the ITAA 1997.
Reasons for Decision
Section 8-1 of the ITAA 1997 allows a deduction for any loss or outgoing to the extent that it is incurred in gaining or producing assessable income and is not a loss or outgoing of capital, or of a capital nature, or a private or domestic nature, or is incurred in relation to gaining or producing exempt income or non-assessable non-exempt income.
The expenditure must be incurred in the course of gaining or producing assessable income. For expenditure to be regarded as being incurred in gaining or producing assessable income, it must be incidental and relevant to that end.
In Case 55/95 95 ATC 454; AAT Case 10,475 (1995) 31 ATR 1328 ( Case 55/95 ) a taxpayer wrote a book about his experiences in a naval engagement during the Second World War. It was accepted that the taxpayer was not carrying on a business as an author. The taxpayer incurred expenses such as postage, stationery, telephone and travel expenses. The Administrative Appeals Tribunal found that the taxpayer was entitled to a deduction for these expenses as they were incurred in earning future royalty income.
The Tribunal stated:
In the present circumstances, there can be little doubt that the nature of the expenses, the subject of the claim, have the essential character of expenditure incurred in the course of gaining or producing what must be assumed to be assessable income.
In the circumstances the Tribunal found that the expenses the taxpayer incurred in revising and updating the book were incurred in the course of earning their assessable income. They were incidental and relevant to that end.
In deciding that the expenses were not capital expenditure, the Tribunal stated:
The items involved are not in their nature items of capital expenditure. They are not directed to the construction of a capital asset, even though one may result incidentally from the expenditure of the amounts claimed. The expenses have the classical revenue characteristics referred to by Dixon J in Sun Newspapers Limited v FC of T (1938) 5 ATD 23; (1938) 61 CLR 337 as being recurrent, repeated, or continual.
The circumstances here are similar to those of the taxpayer in Case 55/95 . The expenses were incurred by the taxpayer in maintaining the book in an up-to-date state for the purpose of continuing to earn assessable income from royalties. There is a clear nexus between the expenditure and the production of assessable income. The expenses are not of a capital nature. They are incurred periodically for the advantage of earning the royalty income for a limited time and are therefore part of an ongoing process of earning royalty income.
Accordingly, the taxpayer is entitled to a deduction under section 8-1 of the ITAA 1997 for the writing expenses they have incurred.
|Date of Amendment
|24 March 2016
||Reasons for Decision
||Amended for clarity and to reflect changes in the relevant legislation.
Date of decision: 3 September 2003
|Year of income:||Year ended 30 June 2002|
| ||Year ended 30 June 2003|
| ||Year ended 30 June 2004|
| ||Year ended 30 June 2005|
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997
95 ATC 454
 AATA 290
AAT Case 10,475
(1995) 31 ATR 1328
Authors & writers
Deductions and expenses
Siebel/TDMS Reference Number: 3712615; 1-7Q24UB1;
Business Line: Small Business/Individual Taxpayers
Date of publication: 3 October 2003