A T O home
Legal Database
Search   
for 
 
Access the database 
Browse database
Searches  
View last document
Quick access 
View legislation
View a document
PDF Email Cross Reference Material Previous/Next Section Contents Previous/Next Result
Printable version
Printable
version

Taxation Determination

TD 95/54


Income tax: capital gains: does a person who acquires the benefit of a restrictive covenant incur a capital loss on the expiry of that covenant?

Attention Please note that the PDF version is the authorised version of this ruling.
Attention This ruling contains references to repealed provisions, some of which may have been rewritten. The ruling still has effect. Paragraph 32 in TR 2006/10 provides further guidance on the status and binding effect of public rulings where the law has been repealed or repealed and rewritten. The legislative references at the end of the ruling indicate the repealed provisions and, where applicable, the rewritten provisions.
Attention This document has changed over time. View its history.

FOI status: may be released

This Determination, to the extent that it is capable of being a 'public ruling' in terms of Part IVAAA of the Taxation Administration Act 1953 , is a public ruling for the purposes of that Part. Taxation Ruling TR 92/1 explains when a Determination is a public ruling and how it is binding on the Commissioner. Unless otherwise stated, this Determination applies to years commencing both before and after its date of issue. However, this Determination does not apply to taxpayers to the extent that it conflicts with the terms of a settlement of a dispute agreed to before the date of issue of the Determination (see paragraphs 21 and 22 of Taxation Ruling TR 92/20).

1. Yes, provided that the benefit of the restrictive covenant does not form part of goodwill on the sale of a business.

2. Subsection 160M(6B) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 applies to deem the person who acquires the restrictive covenant to do so when the covenant is granted.

3. The reduced cost base under subsection 160ZH(3) is the amount paid for the restrictive covenant.

4. On expiry of the restrictive covenant, a change in ownership is taken to have occurred (paragraph 160M(3)(b)), resulting in a disposal for nil consideration. On expiry the covenant, no longer being enforceable, has nil market value for the purposes of the deemed market value rules. This results in a capital loss equal to the amount paid for the restrictive covenant. The capital loss is incurred on the change in the ownership of the benefit (subsection 160U(4)), i.e., when the covenant expires.

Note 1: If the restrictive covenant is considered to be part of the goodwill of a business there are no capital gains tax consequences until the disposal of that goodwill.

Note 2: On the creation of a restrictive covenant, it is vested in terms of paragraph 160M(6)(b) in the person who acquires the benefit of it. By paragraph 160M(6B)(a), that person is taken to have acquired the restrictive covenant at the time applicable under subparagraphs 160U(6)(a)(i) or 160U(6)(b)(i). For a restrictive covenant, that time, we consider, is when the covenant is granted. If the restrictive covenant is created under a contract, the covenant is granted on the making of the contract (subparagraph 160U(6)(a)(i)). If the restrictive covenant is not created under a contract, the covenant is granted when it is vested in the person who acquires the benefit of it (subparagraph 160U(6)(b)(i)).

Note 3: The usual clause for restrictive covenants operates for a specified time, e.g., three (3) years and for a specified geographical area, e.g., 50 km from the City GPO. We would regard the restrictive covenant in this example as expiring at the end of the three (3) year period.

Note 4: The capital gains tax implications of consideration received in respect of restrictive covenants and trade ties are dealt with in Taxation Ruling TR 95/3.

Commissioner of Taxation

27/9/95

Previously issued as Draft TD 95/D4



References

ATO references:
NO  95/2836-9

ISSN 1038 - 8982

Related Rulings/Determinations:
TR 95/3

Subject References:
capital loss
expiry
goodwill
restrictive covenant

Legislative References:
ITAA 160M(3)(b) [rewritten as ITAA 97 104-25(1)]
ITAA 160M(6)(b) [rewritten as ITAA 97 102-25(3); 104-35]
ITAA 160M(6B) [rewritten as ITAA 97 104; 109]
ITAA 160M(6B)(a) [rewritten as ITAA 97 104; 109]
ITAA 160U(4) [rewritten as ITAA 97 104; 109]
ITAA 160U(6)(a)(i) [rewritten as ITAA 97 104-35(2); 104-105(2)]
ITAA 160U(6)(b)(i) [rewritten as ITAA 97 104-35(2); 104-105(2)]
ITAA 160ZH(3) [rewritten as ITAA 97 110-55]

TD 95/54 history   Top  
   Date   Version   Change 
   27 September 1995   Original ruling   
 You are here ®  29 November 2006   Original ruling + note   Repeal provision note 


 


Top of page
More information on page